Most schools, it seems, have implemented the traditional method of tests, quizzes, and grades to measure how much a student has learned. However, it seems that this way falls short; for the following seems to happen: students pack as much as they can into their brains for tests, and then they just forget what they learn. A better method might be to evaluate what students have learned by the qualitative method- how they can apply the knowledge to their own lives and whether or not they remember it.
St. John’s College appears to be one of those institutions that is taking the steps toward the qualitative method of assessing what students have learned. The school places a lot of emphasis on the reading and discussing of great books. Such a method appears interdisciplinary. It would encompass history, philosophy, English, math, science, etc. In addition, it teaches students to think critically and learn how to articulate their viewpoints.
I do not really think that a college has to make radical changes (or any changes, for that matter) to its teaching methods in order to get students to have the proper mindset of learning. Instead, the student should take responsibility to make sure that he has the proper approach to his classes. Already, I think I have received my money’s worth of information and knowledge from JBU. I truly feel that students can have a blast in college if their mindset is to learn and not focus solely on getting a good grade on their next Calculus test. I have had the former mindset, and I just feel so blessed by it.
1. What do you think? Should it be the school’s responsibility to change or should it be the student’s responsibility? Or both?
2. Have you been taking more of a quantitative or qualitative approach to learning?